Saturday, August 15, 2009

"Three Descents" by Scott Cairns

I'm not much of a poetry reader but I've found this poem by Scott Cairns endlessly fascinating. It appeals to so many different interests of mine: theology, Eastern Orthodox thought, classical mythology.
Cairns' poem has three movements. The first two movements depict two pagan tales of journeys into the underworld: Aeneas and Orpheus. The third movement depicts the Eastern understanding of Christ's own descent into hell.

What follows is my own amateur commentary on the poem:

Three Descents

I. Aeneas

As the beloved Palinurus sank
more deeply beneath wave and memory,
as the remnant of his race descended

painted planks to step on foreign shore
and there spark fire, gather wood and water,
even as the god's red fist fell hard into the
sea,

Aeneas pressed through the tangled underbrush
to gain the door to hell. First, of course, he found
the temple of another petty god, graved

with images of all that lay ahead--
his fortune and fate of every soul
he'd implicated in his flight from Troy.

He barely looked, so used he had become
to how little pleasure Time could bring,
so engaged by the prospect of stepping

briefly out of it, if only to return
to Time's demands when he returned to light.
He hurried through the golden vault to find her

whose words would lead him throu
gh the awful gates.
And what would he remember years from now
of what he'd find? Little, save the wretched

figure of his own father coupling death,
nearly indistinguished amid
that mass of shades like dogs tied together

whining. And the figure of the Sybil
likewise bound, then tossed, a bent toy skipped across
a marble floor, moot refusal widening

her eyes, opening her throat as the god's thin voice
coughed out the infernal terms Aeneas
believed he sought, might welcome, until he heard them.

Commentary:

This first section of Cairn's poem tells the tale of Aeneas of the Aeneid. The hero, Aeneas, as he fled from the ruin of Troy in order to fulfill his destiny to be the founder of the Eternal City of Rome, seeks out the entrance to the Underworld in order to fulfill his duty to visit his dead father. In order to do this, as the priestess of Cumae warns him, he must be approved by the gods for if he is not he will be unable to leave the Underworld once he has arrived. The way for him to determine his divine approval is if he finds a golden bough which will grant his access. He does and so he enters Hades, guided by the Sibyl.

His journey among the dead is painful as he must confront the woman, Dido, who killed herself for love of him as well as the ghosts of fallen warriors and dead babies. It is not a pleasant journey. Close to the climax of his journey, meeting with his dead father Anchises, Aeneas witnesses the final purification that dead souls must undergo before beginning their new existence: drinking from the river Lethe, the river of forgetfulness.

Cairns' commentary on Aeneas' journey is brief yet telling. In the
fifth and sixth stanzas, Cairns cites Aeneas' selfish desire to undergo the adventure to the underworld: to escape from Time. Even as he fulfills his duty to honor his father, Aeneas' journey out of Time causes his to turn a blind eye to "the fate of every soul he implicated in his flight from Troy". Consumed as he was with his desire to escape from Time, Aeneas was ignorant of his own guilt in their deaths, and especially in the death of Palinuris, the captain of his ship who he threw overboard to please the gods.

Another important characteristic is the state of the population of the underworld. The Shades- mere shadows of their living forms- are an indistinguishable mass "
like dogs tied together". Here there is no individuality, no self... only the huddled mass of humanity reduced to a pack of dogs. This is a tragic vision no doubt.

II: Orpheus
That his eyes positively shove with the image
he had shaped- of sweet reprieve, of his hand upon
the beloved, lifting her from the narrow crypt

caught floating on barren stillness, unaccustomed
silence-- could not be comprehended by those few
whose minds retained a trace of how the present gloom

was nothing of itself but served to amplify
the absence of the luminous occasions worked
above. That his lit gaze upon those shades who lined
the path could hurt them like a flame did not occur
to him, though he observed their trembling as he passed,
had puzzled as they shrank, slipped back into the Dis.

Her tender heel bitten to the bone, the woman
could barely walk the ruined path she followed down,
and as he pressed with greater speed to apprehend

her frail figure hobbled by its crumbling clay, she turned
to understand the source of sudden suffering,
as if a boy had held a surgeon's glass above

a shriveling midge now stricken by the sun's light drawn
and focused to a beam. As their eyes met, her loss
was total and immediate. When he returned

alone to the sunlit world of things, his life
became one long attempt at shaking free his culpability
in her undoing. And later, as his own flesh

was torn, his body sundered by the famished hands
of famished women, he breathed a last, a single note,
contrite at how his lesser love had hurt her.

Commentary:

Orpheus' quest to the underworld was spurred, not by a selfish desire for glory, but to pursue his wife Eurydice who had died after being bitten on the heel by a poisonous snake. The tale of his journey into the underworld is a tragic one. Granted the graces of the gods, Orpheus ventures into the underworld to reclaim his beloved from her crypt. Orpheus charmed Hades and Persephone with his music. These gods of the underworld then promised that Eurydice could return to the living world. But her rescue and resurrection would contingent on a terrible condition: When Orpheus and Eurydice climb the long stair out of the depths of Hades' realm, they could not look back. If one of them looks back, Eurydice will be lost forever. Such a condition will discern the quality of Orpheus' love for Eurydice: if his love is ruled by agape, a desire for her best interest, he will be able to deny his passion for her long enough to guarantee her resurrection. If, however, his love is selfish and under the control of his passions, he will not be able to resist turning back to her.

The tragedy of Orpheus' tale comes when, just upon reaching the living world, Orpheus' passions overwhelm him and he turns to watch Eurydice. As he turns, as her form fills his vision, he breaks the condition of her resurrection and she is snatched back into the underworld, lost to him forever. And, as if the loss of his beloved was not punishment enough, Orpheus was himself killed by being torn to bits by the impassioned Maenaids in the midst of a Bacchic orgy. And upon his death, his last thought was, as Cairns so carefully and precisely puts it, how his lesser love, his love driven by passion, had doomed Eurydice.

Like Aeneas, Orpheus passes the residents of the underworld in his quest. The Shades, in Cairns' recounting, are wounded by the life that Orpheus brings with him. Like the pain that occurs when a light is first turned on after being in the dark, Orpheus' life burns the Shades whose entire existence is shadowy, barely corporeal, all but annihilation. Orpheus' life hurts those who exist only in death.



III: Jesus
That his several wounds continued to express
a bright result, that still the sanguine flow
courses tincturing the creases of his cheek

and wended as he walked to bless the bleak,
plutonic path with crimson script declaring
just how grave the way that he had come,

that underfoot the very clay he traveled
sank beneath an unaccustomed weight
occurs as no surprise. That he was glad

is largely otherwise, as would be the news
that every sprawling figure found en route
acquired at his approach an aspect far

more limpid than the lot that lay ahead.
As if his passing gained for hell itself
a vivifying agency, each shade

along the way rose startled, blinking, at once
aware that each had been, until this moment,
languishing, until this moment, dead.

Thus, suddenly aware that each among
the withered crowd had by his presence met a sudden quickening, the multitude

made glad by his descent inclined to join
him on the path recovering each loss,
exulting in each past made newly present.

His etched face luminous and very flesh
mde brilliant by the unremitting pulse,
he gains the farthest reaches where the ache

of our most ancient absence lay. He lifts
our mother and our father from beneath
the mindless river, draws them to himself, and turns.

Commentary:

We come finally to the descent of Christ into the underworld. The richness of the symbolism that Cairns' invokes in this poem is extraordinary; the contrasts between Christ and both Aeneas and Orpheus are sharply drawn and exquisite.

First, the symbolism:

The first stanza depicts Christ's blood on his cheek as a "a sanguine flow coursed tincturing the creases of his cheek". The sanguine flow, of course, describes the redness of the blood of Christ. But the language of the sanguine is also an echo of the tradition of heraldry. Further, the language of "tincturing" is also reminiscent of the colors used to emblazon a heraldic shield. What emerges from this heraldic imagery is a picture of Christ, noble even in death: death was something that he chose, that he willed for our sake and so Christ-in-death is not made subject to the horrors of being dead but instead demonstrates his Lordship even in death.

In the second stanza, the "crimson script" is an image of the blood that marks the path that he walks into the underworld, a path "that sank beneath an unaccustomed weight". The unaccustomed weight is, as C.S. Lewis once wrote, the "weight of glory". Christ is a presence of substance in an unsubstantial place.

Second, the comparison:

When it comes to the population of hell, we saw in Aeneas that the Shades were a pack of dogs, no personality. In Orpheus, the Shades were burned by the life that Orpheus bore into the Underworld. With Christ, however, we see that the presence of Life itself, instead of hurting the Shades, brings life to them again. His presence is a "vivifying agency" that causes them to awake, creating in them a "sudden quickening". This language of "quickening" is an archaic way of speaking of living: "the quick and the dead". But there is more to this language than simply the image of life; it is the image of birth, the image of brand new life. The "quickening" is the name for the when a woman first feels her fetus move. Christ is the "firstborn from the dead" as Scripture calls him, yet the birth pangs of his glorious rebirth are felt, echoing, throughout the realm of the dead. At the presence of Life in the realm of Death, the quickening movement of new life, a vivifying of that which had previously been amorphous mass, is felt and all hell trembles.

Finally, Christ reaches the end of his journey into hell, and the resting place of Adam and Eve, our first father and first mother who sleep beneath the river of forgetfulness, the river Lethe. Christ pulls our parents from underneath the mindless river-- from out of forgetfulness into a new sort of knowing, an "un-forgetfulness", an a-lethe. Christ pulls Adam and Eve (and thus all of humanity) out from the river Lethe into his presence of Alethea, out of forgetfulness and ignorance and oblivion and into Truth, the Greek word for which is, of course, alethea. Christ "draws them to himself", to he who is Truth itself. Adam and Eve, who (according to Ireneaus), fell to temptation because of their ignorance, their forgetfulness and immaturity, are now bound together to He who is Truth, he who is Lord of the realm of the living and of the dead. And with our parents now nestled to his bosom, Christ turns and is raised from the dead and draws us out of death and into a glorious new life, a life that is nothing other than Himself.



Friday, August 7, 2009

Happy Things

A friend of mine, a member of the Official Baylor Theological Drinking Society aka "The Drinklings", is in Oxford now for a conference. I just finished a Facebook conversation with her in which she told me that my prospective dissertation advisor, who is also there at this conference, was talking about me and my dissertation project in very positive terms. He said that he believed I would contribute something important to the field of von Balthasar studies.

This makes me happy.

Some other things that make me happy:

1. Being done summer employment.
2. Being listed as a Graduate Fellow of the Baylor Honors College.
3. The prayer: "Catch for us the foxes in the vineyard."
4. A new tasty beer: Hefeweizen.
5. Interesting cinematography
6. The fact that we are closer to cool weather.

Two things that make me sad:

1. My haircut
2. This darn book that I have to read for a class I'm teaching. I'm not a fan of deliberately southern fiction. I've tried but I just can't get into it. Even Walker Percy, who I really want to like, just irritates me.

Back to more happy things:

7. Our new roommate, Ivy. She's super great.
8. That I own what is probably the world's oldest guppy: 2 years and 1 month old.
9. The prospect of eating out this weekend.
10. Being a teacher.

There you go. A happy blog from the depressed guy! The world may in fact be ending.

Wednesday, August 5, 2009

Why do I love the Fricks...?

Why do I love my friends the Fricks?

1. They are both hilarious people as demonstrated on their blog which I hereby recommend: frickhouse.blogspot.com
2. They are both intelligent people who are a delight to talk with.
3. They are dead sexy as demonstrated below:




Let's be honest, folks. That is hot.

So check out their blog and become friends with them. Their intelligence, humor and sex appeal all demand your attention!

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

Why Craig Ferguson is Brilliant

About the name of this blog

The translation for the name of this blog from Latin to English is, "Oh God, you have made us for yourself." This phrase has become important to me as I've been studying Roman Catholic theology in earnest over the last few years. I first discovered it in the writings of Henri de Lubac, particularly in his book from 1946 entitled Surnaturel (that's French for Supernatural :).

In de Lubac's book, he uses this idea of being created by God for God as the liturgical prism through which he examines the ontological (ie: the studying of 'being') understanding that developed in the late 15th century with Thomas Cajetan.

Cajetan argued, based on his faulty analysis of the Angelic Doctor, Thomas Aquinas, that the natural order and the supernatural order were two completely separate orders. Nature is completely distinct from the supernatural-- it has its own means, its own end, its own natural beatitude. The supernatural then becomes something superadded on to the natural. Cajetan arguably read Aquinas in this way in order to safeguard the sheer gratuity of supernatural grace. This, of course, is an important and a noble task. However, de Lubac's point (besides the fact that Aquinas does not fit Cajetan's assessment) is that to think of the supernatural as something "added on" to the natural is to create a dualism between the orders. This dualism, de Lubac rightly warns, may lead to the downfall of Christian engagement in the world (ie: Christianity being relegated to the privatized, supernatural sphere).

What de Lubac counters Cajetan with is this: he argues that there is no such thing as an "ungraced nature". The supernatural is not laid on top of the natural like a layer cake but both infuses and transcends the natural. God created the natural for Himself. That is, God created the natural world so that it contains within itself the desire for God. Nature was created in order to have a supernatural end-- divine beatitude-- rather than a natural one (ie: political, social, economic beatitude).

But what does all of this mean for me and for this blog? As far as I can see it, what de Lubac is arguing for opens up the door for a larger expression of worship. Worship becomes more than just an additional activity that is added into our lives. Rather, supernatural worship fills and floods every natural (read: ordinary) moment. This means that every ordinary event, whether it be plunging the line of a clogged toilet, reading a book, mowing the lawn, talking to the wife, going to work-- all of these things are oriented towards the supernatural. All of the ordinary things are avenues to and are themselves drawn towards fulfillment in supernatural beatitude.

This blog then will dabble in both the sacred and the seemingly profane because, since God has made all things for Himself, even the most worldly and normal things are filled with the scent of the Sacred.

Monday, August 3, 2009

Something old and something new

This is my first posting here on Blogspot. I previously had a full scale website called Wanderings that I had to give up because I couldn't really justify paying Apple another $100 a year for an occasional hobby. So here I am, living it up on a free service! :)

I'm not a particularly good blogger. I don't write consistently. My posts aren't particularly entertaining or scintillating. Mostly, I use the blog to experiment.. with writing, with thinking aloud, with new styles of expression and worship. I will probably talk a lot of theology, a bit of story-telling, a smattering of philosophy, and perhaps a smeckle of art. Sometimes I'll probably talk about my life as a student, as a Christian, as a sinner, as a pilgrim, as a pastor, as a teacher, as a lover of books, as a lover of beer, and as a lover of long, meandering road trips. If that sounds like something you'd enjoy, hey, welcome. If not, no offense taken!

Some of the things that I'll be posting here are old writings from my recently retired website. Others will be new. You'll just have to wait with baited breath as to which you'll get first!

Anyway, welcome and see you guys around.